Current:Home > MarketsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -StockPrime
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-12 22:53:07
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (993)
Related
- The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
- Southern Baptists voted this week on women pastors, IVF and more: What happened?
- Photos offer a glimpse of Bonnaroo music festival in Tennessee
- Euro 2024 highlights: Germany crushes Scotland in tournament opener. See all the goals
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Big 12 commissioner Brett Yormark is perfect man as conference pursues selling naming rights
- 'Predator catchers' cover the USA, live-streaming their brand of vigilante justice
- Charles Barkley says he will retire from television after 2024-25 NBA season
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- History buff inadvertently buys books of Chinese military secrets for less than $1, official says
Ranking
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- Katie Ledecky off to a strong start at US Olympic swimming trials, leads prelims of 400 free
- Does chlorine damage hair? Here’s how to protect your hair this swim season.
- Why Spencer Pratt and Heidi Montag Say 6-Year-Old Son Gunner Is Ready for His YouTube Career
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- Princess Kate shares health update on cancer treatment, announces first public appearance in months
- New Jersey Sen. Bob Menendez's strategy of blaming his wife in bribery trial may have pitfalls
- Sean Lowe and Catherine Giudici Warn Bachelor Couples Not to Fall Into This Trap
Recommendation
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
Another Olympics, another doping scandal in swimming: 'Maybe this sport's not fair'
28 people left dangling, stuck upside down on ride at Oaks Amusement Park: Video
England vs. Serbia: Why Three Lions will (or won't) win Euro 2024 to end trophy drought
How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
What College World Series games are on Saturday?
Man charged in 'race war' plot targeting Black people, Jews, Muslims ahead of election
How much do you spend on Father's Day gifts? Americans favor mom over dad, survey says