Current:Home > MarketsWalt Nauta, Trump aide indicted in classified documents case, pleads not guilty -StockPrime
Walt Nauta, Trump aide indicted in classified documents case, pleads not guilty
View
Date:2025-04-14 14:28:55
Washington — Waltine "Walt" Nauta, former President Donald Trump's employee and an ex-White House aide, pleaded not guilty on Thursday to federal charges alleging he helped Trump obstruct the Justice Department's investigation into the former president's handling of classified documents.
Nauta appeared for a brief arraignment hearing in federal court in Miami on Thursday, and an attorney entered a plea of not guilty on his behalf. Nauta's defense lawyers had asked the judge to delay his arraignment twice in recent weeks so he could secure local representation. His team now includes Sasha Dadan, his newly hired Florida-based attorney.
In the indictment handed down last month by a federal grand jury in Florida that had been convened by special counsel Jack Smith, Nauta was charged with six counts related to the documents investigation, including conspiracy to obstruct justice and concealing records. Five of those counts named Trump as a co-defendant.
Nauta was charged individually with lying to investigators during an interview with the FBI in May 2022. Prosecutors alleged he lied about what he knew about dozens of boxes allegedly containing classified material that had been taken to Trump's Mar-a-Lago resort as he left the White House.
The indictment accused Nauta of working with Trump to move and conceal the boxes, which also included personal items from Trump's time in office. Prosecutors said the pair knew that some of the boxes contained sensitive material and that they were aware of the government's interest in getting those records back into federal custody, but worked to resist those efforts.
On May 11, 2022, a grand jury in Washington, D.C., issued a subpoena requiring the former president's representatives to hand over any and all documents with classified markings in his possession.
A Trump attorney arranged to travel to Mar-a-Lago to search for the documents, the indictment said. The indictment alleges that ahead of the search, Nauta helped move 64 boxes from a Mar-a-Lago storage room in which they were being held and brought them to the residential area of the resort, allegedly at Trump's direction, to conceal them from the attorney.
In the boxes that remained in the storage room, the Trump attorney found 38 sensitive documents and arranged for Justice Department officials to collect them at Mar-a-Lago on June 3, 2022, according to the indictment.
Investigators later secured access to Mar-a-Lago security camera footage and allegedly saw the boxes being moved from the storage room before the attorney's search. The indictment said federal investigators executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago for any remaining documents with classified markings. That August 2022 search yielded 103 documents marked classified.
According to a newly unsealed version of an affidavit that supported the August 2022 search warrant, investigators said Nauta — described in the document only as "Witness 5" — was allegedly seen in the video moving about 50 "Bankers boxes" from a room in Mar-a-Lago in the days after his FBI interview.
Trump is charged with 37 federal counts including the illegal retention of national defense information and conspiracy to obstruct justice. He pleaded not guilty to all counts and has consistently denied wrongdoing in the case, criticizing it as politically motivated.
A trial date is set for August, but prosecutors have requested that Judge Aileen Cannon push the proceedings back to at least December to allow for proper evidentiary discovery, and to make sure Trump's defense team has the necessary security clearances required to examine the classified records. The defense is set to respond to the Justice Department's request early next week.
- In:
- Walt Nauta
- Donald Trump
veryGood! (3331)
Related
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- New US Car and Truck Emissions Standards Will Make or Break Biden’s Climate Legacy
- To Reduce Mortality From High Heat in Cities, a New Study Recommends Trees
- Kourtney Kardashian Proves Pregnant Life Is Fantastic in Barbie Pink Bump-Baring Look
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Amid Glimmers of Bipartisan Interest, Advocates Press Congress to Add Nuclear Power to the Climate Equation
- Frustrated by Outdated Grids, Consumers Are Lobbying for Control of Their Electricity
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $400 Shoulder Bag for Just $95
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Legislative Proposal in Colorado Aims to Tackle Urban Sprawl, a Housing Shortage and Climate Change All at Once
Ranking
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Clean Energy Is Thriving in Texas. So Why Are State Republicans Trying to Stifle It?
- Tennis Star Naomi Osaka Shares First Photo of Baby Girl Shai
- After Cutting Off Water to a Neighboring Community, Scottsdale Proposes a Solution
- Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
- 20 Top-Rated Deals Under $25 From Amazon Prime Day 2023
- Suspected Long Island Serial Killer in Custody After Years-Long Manhunt
- Encina Chemical Recycling Plant in Pennsylvania Faces Setback: One of its Buildings Is Too Tall
Recommendation
Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
Nina Dobrev Recalls Wild Experience Growing Up in the Public Eye Amid Vampire Diaries Fame
Low Salt Marsh Habitats Release More Carbon in Response to Warming, a New Study Finds
EPA Officials Visit Texas’ Barnett Shale, Ground Zero of the Fracking Boom
Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
Nikki and Brie Garcia Share the Story Behind Their Name Change
Once Hailed as a Solution to the Global Plastics Scourge, PureCycle May Be Teetering
The Most-Cited Number About the Inflation Reduction Act Is Probably Wrong, and That Could Be a Good Thing